Jul 5 2009

Sarah's Dilemma

Palin Resigning
For me: Unexpected but not surprising. I didn’t expect Sarah Palin to run for a second term as Governor of Alaska. Even if it was a job she enjoyed and arguably executed well, her post November ‘08 tenure has surely been excruciating.

I can’t think of another example of one party hounding an office holder of the other party so relentlessly for simply being a politically successful member of the opposition. True, the pressure on Palin can be considered a politically legitimate effort to short circuit the ambitions of a potentially dangerous adversary. Still the remorseless onslaught against Sarah has a bad odor about it.

You may not be aware of just how pernicious the campaign against Governor Palin has been. It isn’t just dry-drunk Maureen Dowd, professional gossipist Gail Collins, Keith Olbermann (who famously resigned from MSNBC in 1998 because he was expected to report on the Monica Lewinsky, obstruction of justice scandal) and Trig-truther Andrew Sullivan.

The Governor has also been under the constant duress of 15 lawsuits claiming ethics violations since last November, with no end in sight, running up a legal bill of over half a million dollars despite the fact that 13 of those lawsuits have been summarily dismissed and, of the other two, one was settled for $8,200 (reimbursement of travel expenses claimed for family members) and the other appears to be heading for a fate similar to the 13 non-starters..

This — along with simple malicious slander (such as the gross misrepresentation of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s policies on predator control) — has proven to be an effective way to counter a governor who must otherwise be considered one of the most competent and effective in her state’s (at least recent) history. I only wish the Republicans could work up the gumption to challenge the two squalid crony-masters currently looting NY and NJ! What? You don’t think a relentless campaign of ethics challenges would stand up any better against Corzine and Patterson? Bear in mind, both of these guys have already been caught morally compromised.

So if (like me) you are a Palin fan, this looks like the start of bigger things for Sarah. If you curdle at the words “you betcha!” this must look like a hard-won victory to you. Just Remember: More than one moose became moose-burger by underestimating the lethality of that hockey mom.


Jul 1 2009

Thrilla in Minnesota

Sorry, I couldn’t get it to rhyme exactly.

The drawn out victory of Al Franken over Norm Coleman in the Minnesota senate race is interesting to me for exactly one reason: Al Franken won because the rules say he won.

It is almost certain that Coleman received hundreds or maybe even a few thousand more votes than Franken. But more of the valid, countable votes went to Franken, not Coleman. Under the rules that were in effect on November 4, 2008, absentee ballots were required to be cast in a precise, well defined and adequately disseminated manner and, as it turns out, a big clump of absentee ballots cast for Coleman did not meet that standard. Too bad for Norm Coleman.

This reminds me of an election held eight years earlier in Florida in which Republican county commissioners ran their elections a damn sight better than Democrat county commissioners ran theirs. The Republicans focused on making sure that the voting machines in their counties were in good working order and that polling station staff were well trained and knew what to do in the event of an unforeseen issue. They also took the time, trouble and expense to assure that Republican voters knew how to operate the machines and cast their ballots.

The Democrats focused almost entirely on rounding up people who had never voted in their lives and dumped them en masse at polling stations staffed by people with grossly inadequate training. The inevitable results were as predictable as an Al-Qaeda attack using airplanes. Everyone should have known exactly what the outcome was going to be.

Well, this time the chads fell the other way. Norm Coleman won more votes, but Al Franken won the election — fair and square. You won’t be hearing me saying: “Not my senator!” Well, actually, you might, because I don’t live in Minnesota, but you get the point. Should Coleman have disputed the election as vigorously and tenaciously as he did? Absolutely yes! And, apparently, he did a much better job of following the law and leaving no stone unturned than Al Gore in 2000.

Gore might have actually beaten Bush in Florida if he hadn’t tried to finagle his way to victory by cherry-picking Democrat controlled counties in which to fight. But the fact remains: Under the rules in effect on November 7, 2000, George Bush won the Florida Presidential election — both in votes and in allocation of electors. So get over it if you are still simmering about Katherine Harris (whose only role in the election was to certify the results) and some Fox News consultant (who happened to be related to Bush).


Jan 20 2009

Don't Be a Democrat…For a Few Days, Anyway

Believe it or not that admonition is intended not for my cousins of the blue state persuasion but for my brethern conservatives and that handful of brave souls who still adhere to the Republican banner (a white elephant lying feet up, trunk akimbo on a field of deficit red).

I am begging, pleading that my conservative chums and right-wingmen allay their partisanship through the next few days and join there adversaries in celebrating the most historic Presidential Inaugaration since the first in 1789.  Left or right, red or blue, black or white, Tuesday, January 20, 2009 will be a day for the ages.  And the oath sworn at noon today will mark a great turning point in the history of U.S. politics — if not the history of the U.S. itself.  So don’t spoil it by acting like a Democrat.

Barack Hussein Obama was elected fairly and squarely and by substantive — though not landslide — majorities in both the popular and Electoral College votes cast by the largest voter turnout in history.  For those who are not taking my point, let me more direct: Barack Hussein Obama is our duly elected President, the head of the Executive Branch of our government, and “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States” (so, please Will Smith and Oprah, stop refering to him as your Commander in Chief unless you have taken up a uniform of the U.S. armed forces). He is neither the pResident Select nor the Commander in Thief.  Like every other president before him (except probably JFK) he will become president legitimately and lawfully.

He will be my president as much any Democrat’s and I intend to give him a fair shot at it.  And I am asking my conservative and Republican comrades to do the same.  For the 100 days following the Inaugaration, he will have my unqualified support.  I will continue to give him the benefit of the doubt for the remainder of this year, but if he hasn’t solved all of my problems by the 2010 election, well, I will consider all Democrats indelibly tainted.

My bill of particulars is drawn in large measure from the criticism of the 43rd administration, much of which — it might surprise you to learn —  I agree with, to a degree.  But these should be no-brainers for the incoming administration:

  • Put an end to the morally indefensible “Don’t ask don’t tell” policy governing the participation of homosexuals in the U.S. military. Why this is an issue is simply beyond me. Either homosexuality is such an impediment to discipline and good order that there shouldn’t be the least compunction about prohitibiting it. Or, more likely, it doesn’t make a damn bit of difference as long as unsolicited sexual advances are strictly off limits. In either case, this issue could and should be resolved with a simple and swift executive order.
  • Close the Gitmo detention center – don’t just order it closed; don’t just lament its existence; close it.  Personally, I have always believed that it was a lousy response to a lousy situation, regardless of how bad the detainees are or were — and they were.
  • Bring the troops home — don’t send them to the sinkhole of Afghanistan.  That war was lost the moment the Bush administration decided to engage in nation building.  Focusing on Iraq has had nothing to do with the failure of Afghanistan.  The misbegotten Afgan adventure — I mean beyond the routing of the Taleban — was doomed from the start no matter how many lives and how much treasure we squander on it.  Afghanistan, as a country, never existed before the 20th century and it never will.  The recipe for success there? Let it simmer in its own juices; bomb from time to time as necessary to remind them that there are consequences to bad behavior.
  • Cure Parkinson’s, Cancer and AIDS. You can do it now that science will once again be unfettered and solidly on the public dole.  I don’t remember who, exactly, but I remember someone saying during the 2004 Democrat convention that “Christopher Reeves would be walking by [then] if Al Gore [had been] elected in 2000.”  Well, maybe not, but I’m expecting miracles from the scientific community now that there will no longer be restrictions on federal funding of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research.  I expect Obama to reverse the Bush administration and return to the Clinton policy on hESC more or less immediately…er, um…maybe not the Clinton policy of no funding regardless of restrictions, but, you know, the policy Al Gore maybe, might have implemented had he been elected in 2000.
  • End Gobal Warming! Well, the man-made part of it anyway.  The solar and geophysical trends of the last 20,000 years will just have to work themselves out.  Hopefully, once petroleum exhaust and cow farts are under control, all the other warming that’s been going on remorselessly since the last ice age will kind of work itself out, or won’t matter…or something.
  • Save us from economic ruin.  Why should anyone have to suffer the consequences of their own irresponsible actions?
  • If you can’t give us all free health care, at least make someone else pay for it, just like the Europeans and Canadians who get all the health care they can handle without ever seeing what percentage of their tax bill goes to “free” medicine.
  • And while we’re on the subject of Europeans: Can we please let them pay a little more for their own defense?  I mean, does it seem right to you that these people should be forced to ally themselves with a corrupt empire like the U.S. just to keep the ayatollahs and Russians at bay? Think how much better they will feel about themselves if we just let them take care of their own security problems.

The list could go on, of course, but I’ll settle for just that little to-do list.  I would, however, like to remind the incoming administration of something that should not be overlooked:

Al-Qaeda is determined to attack inside the United States.  They might use airplanes or truck bombs or suicide bombers.  They might highjack airplanes and hold the passengers hostage or they might crash the airplanes into buildings or into other airplanes or for find some other nefarious purpose.

They might use the truck bombs against public or private buildings or just explode them in public places with a lot of people around.  They might do something similar with suicide bombers.  Or they might place cell phone triggered bombs on commuter trains or in hotel lobbies.  They might have guys with machine guns, hand grenades and satchel bombs attack airports, hotels and restaurants.

I don’t know how I can be more specific than this — I mean I’ve just detailed several scenarios that must surely be on AQ’s drawing board right now.  And anyone can imagine this happening at any time.  So President Obama, if any of this happens on your watch: It’s on you buddy — just like Bush is saddled with 9/11.


Nov 11 2008

Ready to What???

U.S. Presidents don’t “rule” they govern. This may seem a bit nitpicky, but it is an essential constitutional principal. And, by the way, the President of the United States does not “run the country.” The POTUS runs the Executive Branch of the Federal Government. An important job, to be sure, but not equivalent of a king.

Continue reading


Nov 7 2008

A Vote to Nowhere?

I’m probably making too much of this but, for me, this was the biggest surprise of election night.

Ted Stevens was one of the Republicans the Democrats were most certain they would be knocking off on their triumphant march to total domination of Congress.  It seemed obvious to everyone that there was little chance he would retain his Senate seat having been convicted of a felony just a few days before the election.  But, here he is, leading in the count with 99% of counties reporting.

Of course, it’s unlikely that the Senate will actually seat him on January 3rd.  The chamber has the right to refuse membership to anyone it deems a discredit to the body.  Still, I don’t think there is any actual law or rule prohibiting a convicted felon from serving out a duly elected term.  That might prove a bit inconvenient if he is actually incarcerated.


Oct 31 2008

It's Still Not Obvious to Me

This is a difficult election for me.  I have a longstanding dislike for “Maverick” John McCain and I find Barrack Obama very likable.  I didn’t want McCain in 2000, and he’s done nothing to change my mind since.  Obama is a very appealing candidate and I can think of several reasons to support him.

So what’s the problem?  Why is this so difficult for me?  In brief: A McCain administration, IMHO, will be just another disappointment for conservatives and further erode the credibility of the Grand Old Party; An Obama administration scares the bejesus out of me politically, but is likely to be at least competent in the execution of its agenda.

Continue reading


Oct 19 2008

Live From New York…You Betcha!

It’s not just because I’m madly in love with the governor of Alaska (both politically and in an adolescent way). She was a knockout on SNL last night (in a couple of ways there too). And for the first time that I can recall, I am in total agreement with Alec Baldwin when he says that Sarah is: “…way hotter…” than I expected her to be. Red or blue, this is just funny:

This bit comes as close as anything I’ve seen to an acknowledgment that the race is over and it’s OK for Sarah to participate in a sketch that comes this close to crossing the line without worrying about the political repercussions. None the less, the cool with which she accepts this mini-roasting speaks volumes on her behalf and the kind of person she is underneath the campaign gloss.

Both sketches were genuinely funny, not least because Sarah was so good…so at ease, so well prepared.  In both bits she comes across as very poised and intelligent and very, very comfortable with who she is.  It is abundantly evident that Sarah is un-apologetically Sarah all the time.

Sarah Palin 2012? You betcha!


Oct 16 2008

Run That by Me Again Joe?…

In the interest of fairness, because I’m in such an expansive mood today, here’s one for the right:

Or, to parahrase iconic poet of the left, Bob Dylan:

And I do not really need to be
Assured that jobs is just a four-letter word

I wonder: Will VP Biden be getting the Dan Quayle treatment from the media for the next four years? Not so much, I think.


Oct 16 2008

Sums Up the Campaign Pretty Well

Yes, I am well aware that McCain was trying to interject a bit of self-deprecating humor and, yes, I fully understand AP’s intentions in publishing this picture with no attempt to provide context.  But, all-in-all, I still think this moment in time pretty well captures where this election cycle is and where it is going.

C’mon McCainiacs…It’s funny. You know it’s funny, so lighten up a little.


Oct 15 2008

Live Blogging the Presidential Debate

OK, here we go…

Bob Scheiffer introduces tonights contestants… aw nuts, it’s Obama and the angry old white guy again.

Scheiffer asks them who’s got the better plan.  Right off the bat these two guys can’t agree on who’s plan is better.

OK…taxes…mortgages…Joe the plumber…

Now they’re disagreeing again over who should win the election — can’t these guys just get along?

blah, blah, blah, blah…

Old white guy: “YOU LIE!”

Young black guy: “No, YOU LIE!”

They both seem to be agreeing that the other guy is running a lousy campaign.

Agreement again! They’re both happy with their choices for running mates and both believe the other one’s choice was a mistake.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Huh?  What?  Waddaya mean it’s over?  What happened?  Who got voted off?